The same method applied to the twelve casinos in this catalogue is on the casino page, and what it is paid for is stated on the about page.
What the site claims, and how strongly
There are two kinds of statement on this site and they carry very different weight. The first is structural: one of the four costs on this route is flat rather than proportional. That is not an estimate, it is how a blockchain fee works, and everything important here follows from it. The second is quantitative: the specific percentages. Those are assumptions, and they are printed as ranges for that reason.
The four assumptions on the way in
| Step | Assumed cost | Where it comes from |
|---|---|---|
| Bank or wallet | 0–0.5% | published tariffs |
| The P2P spread | 1.5–4% | observed gap between P2P quotes and the official rate |
| The network fee | ₦480–₦4,000 flat | published chain fees, converted at a round rate |
| Crediting at the casino | 0–1.5% | published tariffs |
The one entry that is not a published tariff is the spread, because nobody publishes it — it is a gap, not a charge.
The four on the way back
| Step | Assumed cost | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Casino payout | 0–1% | Most crypto casinos pay out in the coin without a fee of their own, and charge the network fee to the player instead. |
| The network fee, again | ₦480–₦4,000 flat | The same flat fee in the other direction, and the same choice of chain. |
| Selling back to naira | 1.5–4% | The spread again, now on the other side of the book. |
| Into the bank | 0–0.5% | The cheap step again — provided the account that receives the naira is the same one that sent it. |
Verification is not in this table because it costs no money. It is still the step most likely to stop a withdrawal.
How a figure on any page is produced
- The amount enters the first stepThe cost of each step is taken from the range above — the low end for the best case, the high end for the worst.
- Each step takes its share of what remainsNot of the original. This is why the total is slightly less than the sum of the percentages, and it is the correct way round.
- The network fee ignores the amountIt is subtracted as ₦480 or ₦4,000 regardless of what is passing through, which is the entire point of the site.
- Nothing is rounded until it is printedFigures are computed in full and rounded to the naira for display only.
Worked example, ₦50,000 in the worst case: Bank or wallet −₦250, The P2P spread −₦1,990, The network fee −₦4,000, Crediting at the casino −₦656. Arrives: ₦43,104, which is 13.8% lost. The same amount in the best case arrives at ₦48,770.
What this site refuses to publish
- Payout times. Nobody here has timed a withdrawal at any operator, so no page claims one. Where another site says "instant" with no test attached, that is marketing copy.
- Return-to-player figures without a citable source. An RTP with no citation is a number someone typed.
- Invented experience. This site reads documents. It has not played at these operators and does not pretend to have.
- Ways around a restriction. Of any kind, in any direction, not even in passing.
- A ranking that is for sale. Every entry in the catalogue leads to the same place, which is why no position in it is worth anything.
How the catalogue is checked
Each operator's licence is read in the regulator's own register rather than taken from the footer of its website, and the month recorded here is the month the register shows. That is a statement about the existence of a document and nothing more: a licence is not a guarantee, and this site cannot resolve a dispute with anyone.
| Operator | Licence as read | Assets in cashier |
|---|---|---|
| Rakebit | Anjouan Gaming Board · ALSI-202602030-FI2 · valid | 15 |
| Wild.io | Curaçao · issued 14 April 2025 · read in the register | 12 |
| Metaspins | Curaçao · issued 4 October 2024 | 9 |
| Betpanda | Curaçao · read in the register | 8 |
| LeeBet | Anjouan · read in the register | 10 |
| DuckDice | Anjouan · read in the register | 20 |
Where an operator's terms do not publish a verification threshold, the catalogue records that it is not published rather than inventing one.
What would change these numbers
Three things, and all of them are welcome. A materially different observed spread would move every proportional figure. A change in chain fees would move the flat one. And a set of real records from real transfers would replace the whole table above with measurements — which is why keeping a record of the route exists as a page.
Until then the honest description of this site is: arithmetic performed openly on stated assumptions, about a route that other sites do not price at all.